Over a year ago, Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed charges against two of Trump’s former lawyers and a former Trump aide in relation to the fake elector scheme in the 2020 elections. Since that time, one of the defendants, Jim Troupis, has soon out as being an exceptionally whiny-assed baby, trying to play the victim card in all this.
Troupis filed a motion to dismiss the charges, claiming such nonsense as it was a violation of his Right to Free Speech. The judge hearing the case, the Honorable John D. Hyland, issued his ruling on the motion. What was left of Troupis could have been picked up with a broom and dustpan:
Federal prosecutors have said the fake electors plot originated in Wisconsin.
“… it does not matter that Troupis disagrees with the facts alleged in the complaint. Most criminal defendants do. Our system resolves these disagreements in a trial — at his trial. Troupis may use history as a way to explain to a jury he never intended to commit forgery. What Troupis may not do, however, is use that history to re-write the criminal complaint,” Hyland wrote in his order denying the request to dismiss.
[…]
