CNN’s Pamela Brown got under Stephen Miller’s skin for observing that after Trump victories in court, the administration is silent, but when a court rules against them, suddenly judges are going rogue.
Brown noted Trump’s big win today from the Supreme Court on deportations, and then grilled guest Stephen Miller.
It’s disgusting that cable news has that fanatic on their shows. He’s a known quantity, screaming for the dear leader and attacking anyone who doesn’t support his fuhrer with enough adoration.
Miller pretended her question was misleading when it was the actual truth. The terms “rubber stamp and “checks and balances” triggered the racist Deputy Chief of Staff.
BROWN: I think it was the second one on this particular issue, just in the last few weeks. Yet, even just yesterday, we saw whenever a judge rules against this administration, you say they’re going rogue.
Do you think a judge should just rubber stamp what your White House does? If not, what checks and balances do you think should be in place for this White House?
MILLER: It’s not the job of a district court judge to perform an individual green light or red light on every single policy that the president takes as the head of the executive branch.
Just think about the premise baked into your question. Respectfully, Pam, you’re saying that when the American people elect a president of the United States of America…
BROWN: I’m not saying that.
